I've just been reading the 100th issue of Youth and Policy Journal. It's not happy reading. I've not made it through all the article yet, but the tone of those I've read appears despondent and hyper-critical of most youth policy developments of the last 10, if not 25 or 30 years.
Times may be tough, and youth policy and practice may be far from where it should be as we move in 2009. But I can't help feeling that the voices I hear predominating in Youth & Policy do little to provide any form of constructive vision on how to move forward; how to stay true to the values of emancipatory, empowering Youth Work in a diverse, dynamic and globalised information-age society.
But, I don't wish this blog post to fall into the trap it seems many of the articles of Youth and Policy hit: critique without any hint of a constructive way forward - and so, want to offer the editors of Youth & Policy four suggestions to help make the future of Youth and Policy one that contributes to positive and proactive developments in Youth Work, rather than a lament for the past.
1) Engage young people in the peer review and editorial process
It is clear that the majority of contributors to Youth and Policy want a better lot for young people. Defining a better lot for young people should take place in partnership with young people themselves.
Projects like the Young Researcher Network have already shown that there are meaningful ways of engaging young people as researchers. And there would be a lot to gain from Youth & Policy exploring ways of engaging young people as part of the editorial and review team. Not only would it provide key grounding for the explorations in the journal - but it would provide opportunities for young people to learn about, explore and engage with the live debates at the heart of youth work today.
Creating non-tokenistic and genuine models for a diverse range of young people to get involved in the editorial and peer review process of Youth & Policy would not necessarily be easy... but I can't think for a better challenge for a journal that regularly sharing writing on youth participation to engage with.
2) Make the back issues available online and move towards an Open Access Journal model
Right now the 100 issue history of Youth and Policy is locked away in volumes gathering dust on shelves. To follow Bernard Davies' survey of 'twenty-five years of Youth & Policy' you either need access to your own personal collection of back issues, or plenty of time to spend in the library.
Opening up the back issues of Youth & Policy free online would lower the barriers to entry that limit new academics and reflective-practitioners from contributing to the debate over the present, past and future of youth work; and it would increase the resources available with which to explain the intellectual and practical underpinnings of youth work to policy makers.
In the long run, it would make sense for a journal which talks so much about empowerment and education, to ensure that it's content is available to all those who wish to access it - without financial barriers. A future with Youth & Policy as an Open Access Journal would be a better one indeed.
3) Record short summary PodCast interviews with each journal contributor
Even if Youth & Policy was available in full text freely online - it would still not be accessible to all the people who could gain from engaging in the dialogue and debate it can catalyse. That's why I would love to see a Youth & Policy blog, with short recorded PodCast interviews with each of the article authors - allowing their insights and critiques to reach ever wider audiences.
P
erhaps the PodCast audio-interview model could provide a good opportunity for young people to be in dialogue with Youth & Policy authors - as co-interviewees on each PodCast...
4) Build an online community around the journal
I've discovered over the last year that there is real demand for online youth work communities and we are most definitely in need of an online space for more dialogue around the present, past and future of youth work. A space where readers can respond to Youth & Policy articles without necessarily penning a full article in response, and where the practitioner and academic communities can find a space for the sort of constructive dialogue and sharing of learning that is necessary to the praxis as well as theory of a constantly developing work of youth work.
Perhaps some of these suggestions have been tried in the past? Perhaps they are simply beyond the means of a small journal? But perhaps, if anyone from the Youth & Policy team is reading, perhaps they might be explored as ways of making sure the dialogue in Youth and Policy really can be a dialogue making a better future for Youth Work and, more importantly, for young people.