News and views from the world of cypnow.co.uk

June 2008 - Posts

  • A spoonful of Sugar...

    CYP Now isn’t afraid to get controversial, no sir. This year’s Positive Images awards saw a slightly surprising winner – a teen girls magazine.

    These mags get brought up again and again as being negative influences on young people – especially young girls.  They’re almost universally panned in certain circles (my dad, for one) for encouraging teenage promiscuity, frivolity, and wrecking young girls body image by bombarding them with photos of skinny models and celebrities.

    They’re labelled vacuous.  They’re accused of promoting negative behaviours like dieting, keeping up with fashion, relationships, sex….always back to sex.

    But hang on.  Don’t teenagers already have sex?  With or without the aid of Sugar magazine and it’s ilk?

    A second winner in the Positive Images awards was the UK Youth Parliament’s (UKYP) excellent campaign on sex and relationships education.

    You may remember their study hit the headlines late last year when, after surveying more than 20,000 schoolchildren, the UKYP revealed sex education in schools was so bad half the teenagers surveyed were left in total ignorance.

    Furthermore, it’s universally known and proved that countries with low rates of sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s) and teenage pregnancy, adopt the attitude that guess what? Sex among teenagers happens, and depriving them of information and advice about it is counter-productive.

    What a contrast to the UK, where our continually worrying rates of teenage pregnancy and STD’s among young people go hand-in-hand with ghastly rants from the right-wing press about the scandal of some (not nearly enough) teenagers being able to get condoms at school and other such chuntering.

    CYP Now rightly salutes Sugar magazine for its wise, warm and inspirational way of connecting with young girls. In fact CYP Now salutes all its Positive Images Award winners and hopes you’ll log in over the coming weeks to read more about these wonderful projects, publications and campaigns that help celebrate our young people for what they really are – the future.

     

  • Lessons you can't learn from My Little Pony

    The RSPCA wants to ban animals in the classroom, urging teachers and nursery workers to instead get children to play with soft toys or use role play and drama.

    Furthermore, the animal charity continues, instead of helping care for the school hamster, children should be observing animals’ behaviour in their natural habitat.

    How that includes the millions of children growing up in inner cities hasn’t really been addressed. Apart from pestilent wild foxes and the odd rat, how exactly is your average London pupil supposed to observe animals in their natural habitat?  Last time I checked there weren’t that many hamsters and rabbits hoppity-hopping down Upper Street.

    OK there are green spaces in the city and yes a lot of nurseries and schools could, as the RSPCA suggests, create a wildlife area in their gardens, assuming they are lucky enough to have a garden and the local council hasn’t flogged it for flats.

    But how are children going to learn to respect, handle and care for animals if they’re not allowed anywhere near them?

    A hamster, rabbit or a couple of guinea pigs is as much a staple of nurseries and schools as milk and cookies.

    Children can learn so much from these little creatures.  They can learn respect for other life forms. They can learn that in order to care for an animal, one must be responsible and unselfish and consider the animal’s needs before their own. They can learn how it feels to have another creature totally dependent upon them for food, water, warmth and companionship, and these are lessons no amount of role play or My Little Pony can drum home.

    Where better for children to learn about the creatures they share the planet with but in school or in a nursery?  Where else can they learn that to care for an animal is a privilege – to take Hazel the hamster home for the school holidays is an honour – and to be a responsible and caring pet owner they must consider the needs of the animal on a daily basis?  And where else can they do this under proper adult supervision?

    If the RSPCA succeeds in removing animals from school and early years settings, it will have taken away one of the immeasurable delights of childhood – an invaluable learning opportunity wrapped up in a cute, fluffy, appealing package.

    I once took Hazel the hamster home for the summer holidays. I wanted my own pet and my parents quite sensibly wouldn’t allow it until I had proved I could be trusted to care for one.

    After six weeks of lovingly tending to Hazel’s every need, I was taken to a garden centre where I picked out a little chestnut-and-white ball of fluff all of my own.

    By then I had learned animals weren’t a novelty. A dog (or hamster) wasn’t for Christmas, it was for life. I don’t think pretending to be a rabbit at nursery school or playing with soft toys really could have prepared me for that.

     

  • Can fining parents help stop truancy?

    This week on www.cypnow.co.uk we ran a story about a north of England council which has been fining parents for their children’s truancy.

    You’d hope the fine was the last straw and that the council has been meeting with parents to discuss their children’s absences, and the way forward, before hauling them into court and demanding money.

    But will a fine really work? I’m thinking a resounding no.

    Fining parents means we think it’s their fault. We’re saying if your child doesn’t go to school, you’re a bad parent and you’ll get hit in the pocket. Is that fair? Truancy is notoriously more common among children from more deprived backgrounds. Such as single-parent families where mum or dad doesn’t have enough hours in the day to work to make a living, look after the young ones and make sure little Johnny goes to school.  What use is a £200 fine in that situation?

    You can’t discount what Bob Geldof referred to in a CYP Now interview as ‘feckless parenting’ but I would imagine a very small proportion of truancy is due to this phenomenon and furthermore is any ‘feckless’ parent going to pull their socks up because of a fine?

    There are other ways. Schools and authorities should be working with parents, not against them. If a parent knowingly allows their child to truant, it suggests that parent doesn’t have a high opinion of the value of school and probably had bad experiences at school themselves.  The local authority coming down on them like a ton of bricks and demanding cash compensation isn’t going to change that opinion of school and authorities in general.

    And if a child is truanting without parental knowledge all the more reason why that parent needs help and support, not a stinging fine and an even more stinging sense of failure.

     

Children & Young People Now is the official publication for members of the National Children's Bureau and The National Youth Agency.