I don't know why James has got it in for me. The 'cabbie' story was attempting to point out that our rational liberal position is very firmly at odds with those who, for many reasons, hold vicious and punitive stances towards young people, especially those who offend. As far as selling my soul to the YJB for thirty pieces of silver, I am an easy target but James, like many, do not know what battles and arguments I have fought and made behind the scenes (some with considerable success, some which met with abject failure). I deplore our use of custody for so many young offenders but I am proud of the resources we have levered for youth crime prevention. When you get the opportunity to be part of something like the YJB, the immediate dilemma is whether or not to get your hands dirty or stand 'principles intact' on the sidelines. Most people do not get the chance; I did, though I nearly resigned soon afterwards on account of the street robbery initiative and the incarceration of mobile phone thieves. The advice to me at the time was not to go; I would simply be replaced by someone whose views were more in keeping with the prevailing political views of the time. That is the harsh truth of the matter. I don't know what James is talking about when he refers to cash - yes, I get a payment as a Board member but - given the time I put in - it probably amounts to relative little (probably less than a sessional youth worker). Anyway, tarnished as I obviously am in his eyes, he can feel happy that my term of appointment comes to an end at the end of this very month: I will no longer have the opportunity to act 'shamefully', as he sees it. I simply continue to profess that I have contributed as much to the welfarisation of criminality rather than to what others see as the criminalisation of social welfare. The reality may not yet, if ever, square with the rhetoric, but - as we already have in Wales - we are rather closer now that we were when I joined the Board to a position of seeing young people who break the law as children first and offenders second. Read the latest annual report.
And finally, if he knew rather more about my past and my principles, he would know that I have taken every opportunity to advocate for youth work, which is my spiritual, professional and academic home. I may not have done so on TV (time gave very little chance to say anything) but I certainly did during the hearings of the Street Weapons Commission and in the preparation of the final report. Indeed, I think the whole commission was persuaded that there needs to be at least reconsideration, if not immediate restoration, of local community and youth provision that does not have to run with recurrent funding crises nor twist and turn at the whim of short-term targets.
Long ago I had to make a choice as to wheter to snipe from the sidelines or get stuck in. I know that some people - including my dear late friend Bert Jones, whom I wrote a tribute column about to which I believe James replied - felt that I had 'sold out', and so I have to endure the critique, but to blandly assert that I can be relied on to find fault with others - what on earth is that referring to? I was explain the bigoted views of the taxi driver in the context of the particular circumstances of his family life and place of residence.